Transition

The Transition has/has not begun . . . you select the appropriate choice.   It is crystal clear that I lost badly and that President Trump, while taking a drubbing, was not repudiated to the degree that he so justly deserved after such an in-adequate performance over the last 4 years. That he could garner nearly 50% of the vote after neglecting to do his job shows us the low level of competency that our society is operating under and the severe cognitive limitations of the voters. We have to hope that if the millions of people who did not participate had joined in, we could enjoy a higher degree of confidence that our political system shows a better degree of potential for transforming itself into an actual democracy than we have seen so far. Furthermore, the need for national management of elections and elimination of the Electoral College will be required for the Presidency and Congress to be transformed into effective instruments of majority rule. Currently, our system of elections cannot provide for “the equal protection of the laws” as guaranteed in Section I of the 14th Amendment.

With Donald J. Trump over 5 million votes behind Joseph R. Biden in the popular count, and with Joe Biden in possession of over 300 Electoral votes, the nation and the world note that the election isn’t really over and we have in all probability another two months of sorting to do before we reach January 20, 2021; chiefly because Mr. Trump is as unprepared to relinquish power as he has been unable to wield it. Meanwhile as the ravages from the coronavirus pandemic expand here in the United States, and equity markets in New York party on, it’s increasingly likely that by the end of the first quarter of next year, the world economy will see its worst shocks since the Great Depression of the 1930’s. There are simply too many people who have been cut out of the cash flow for late-stage capitalism to meet the needs of a planet in extreme economic, political and environmental stress. With the amount of borrowing going on to keep governments solvent, and for speculators to play the markets, the situation is custom-designed for a liquidity crisis of shocking dimensions. If, in the face of these challenges, we as a people can come to terms with our paralyzing fears and rise to a new level of self-sacrifice, popular government may rise above the morass of corruption and in-effectiveness into which it has sunk. If we cannot, a terrible reckoning awaits us.

 

 

Closing Argument

Marx famously once said about sincerity in politics, “Once you learn how to fake sincerity, you’ve got it made” . . . that would be Groucho Marx, not Karl Marx. I must admit I never really mastered the faking of much of anything; and the only other advice from Groucho that I remember offhand is that outside of a dog, a book is man’s best friend, and inside a dog it’s too dark to read. Some of my analyses are informed by dialectic materialism and the concept of class conflict, and there is no reason why we should not put to use European ideas that have been in circulation for nearly 200 years if they help us to straighten our paths to political success.

The more extensive rendering of my concept of socialism with republican values as its backbone is stated in the book I wrote under the pen-name of Jean Valjean, titled Delusion and Abandonment, and the 2nd Edition published last year includes a postscript delineating the strategy for my campaign that has been referenced in these posts at this site. Specifics as to the direction that the 117th Congress will need to take are there as is some philosophical background to bolster my attack on binary thinking and the danger we face from reducing complex problems to a false dichotomy by getting muddled up and tied down in oversimplifications. I believe what you have read at this site is not over-simplified; and, yes, it’s a description of the  monopoly in the political arena of United States government through the bifurcation of political alliances into only two groups in such a fashion as to be injurious to our future as a country and more broadly to the survival of our species and planet.

If we are not able to stage an advance on those issues that I referred to as ‘low hanging fruit’, progress on the life and death challenges related to managing climate change will escape us through lost time. We know the basic facts about increasing global temperature and what that indicates about the adjustments that we need to make in a world economy that runs on fossil fuel. The evidence, of course, is more broadly registered in worldwide occurrences such as melting glaciers and ice shelves, collapsing species counts for creatures as diverse as large mammals and amphibians, and catastrophic events such as wildfires, hurricanes and floods. But putting actual numbers to the phenomenon is not hard. We are already over 400ppm in carbon dioxide and we do not seem to be gaining ground on stopping temperature increases. Limiting an increase to 1.5 degrees C above the pre-industrial levels between now and end of the century seems out of reach as we could double that barrier over the next 20 years unless we do better than the 2015 Paris Agreement from which we have conspicuously withdrawn. With world population over seven billion the impacts to peoples all over the world will be such that we need to craft worldwide approaches to public health, education and statecraft that are not based on permanent warfare and economic exploitation and extraction of natural resources. In other words, we need to act even as we talk and plan if we wish to survive as societies that enjoy the benefits that civilization has brought to many all over the world over the last 500 years of history.

It would appear that the Age of Trump has run it’s course as the man himself has been totally unequal to the job. While playing to the cameras the heavy lifting has not been done. In addition, things like logging the Tongass National Forest, opening the Arctic Wildlife Refuge to drilling, and destroying Alaska’s Bristol Bay are suicidal miscalculations. We need to leave all of the man and his approach behind. I always liked Billy Connolly’s take on the old saying, “Don’t criticize a man until you’ve walked a mile in his shoes”. He adds, “and then after you have, what’s the point ? . . .  he’s a mile behind you and you have his shoes”.

In a very real sense the corona virus pandemic has given the world opportunities of time, space and focus to recalibrate and to alter significantly the way that the world has organized itself in the modern age. For me this tempers the pain of my defeat in this election and leaves me optimistic over what we can next do to address our problems.  But act we must, and with some urgency.