As the old sports cliche goes, and one that is frequently invoked when a huge under-dog is facing a team of killer proportions, “it is what it is”. The big parties, Democrats and Republicans alike, would for the most part be willing to give up the country and Constitution in order to stay in power for another 15 minutes, not to mention           2, 4, or 6 years. The unwillingness to allow competition goes well beyond an avoidance of a rational and meaningful discussion of specific policy differences.

If one takes large cash contributions from health insurance firms, weapons producers, pharmaceuticals, or oil & chemical companies, one does not want to get into any talking points that might relate to issues where more than two-out-of-three voters desire massive reforms. It would then be clear that work-arounds to substantially change the current state of affairs are within reach and reform would ensue that would improve efficiency and limit private profit. For those privileged sectors that have managed to hedge risks, protect gains, and avoid regulations, the status quo is the sweet spot. Some talk of ‘ambitious, tepid incrementalism’ is to be tolerated, but actual forward progress should be shunned in favor of posturing.

I know how the game is played and I know that with my approach to the issues it is hard to get traction; but I think the need to refine our solutions by discussing the nature of our present paralysis requires the methods and policy positions that I advocate.